Sizing the U.S. Cross-Border Repo Market
Published: April 9, 2026
Views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent official positions or policies of the OFR or Treasury.
Cross-border repurchase agreements (repos) that have one counterparty domiciled outside the United States comprise about a third of the U.S. repo market. Domestic and foreign financial institutions use these instruments to move cash and collateral across the U.S. border and to broaden the investor base to international markets. While these cross-border repos help facilitate the U.S. dollar’s place as the global reserve currency, they can create financial stability vulnerabilities because they can act as channels that transmit shocks across jurisdictions.1
Data on cross-border repos have been limited, leaving market participants and researchers unable to accurately assess the size of international repo flows. Using the new, non-centrally cleared bilateral repo (NCCBR) data collection, OFR has shown that $1.3 trillion or about one quarter of NCCBR are denominated in a foreign currency.2 Still, cross-border repos include all repos with a foreign counterparty, including repos denominated in U.S. dollars. This analysis identifies all repos with a foreign counterparty using the LEI and legal name fields in the NCCBR collection.3
Figure 1: Outstanding Repos by Segment, Cross-Border Direction, and Currency
| Total | Cross-Border | Foreign-Currency Denominated |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic lender with foreign borrower |
Foreign lender with domestic borrower |
||||||
| $ Billions | $ Billions | Percent | $ Billions | Percent | $ Billions | Percent | |
| Tri-party | 3,122.5 | 375.8 | 12.0 | 133.9 | 4.3 | - | 0.0 |
| Cleared | 4,699.9 | 791.7 | 16.8 | 253.7 | 5.4 | - | 0.0 |
| NCCBR | 4,928.2 | 1,160.8 | 23.6 | 1,337.6 | 27.1 | 1,357.9 | 27.6 |
| Total | 12,750.7 | 2,328.3 | 18.3 | 1,725.2 | 13.5 | 1,357.9 | 10.6 |
Note: Values are daily averages over the period from July 2025 to February 2026. Cleared includes FICC’s GCF Repo Service, DVP Service, Sponsored DVP Service, and Sponsored General Collateral Service. Tri-party does not include the New York Federal Reserve’s ON RRP.
Sources: Bank of New York, OFR, Author’s analysis.
Most cross-border repos occur in the NCCBR segment where they are evenly split between cash flows “out” (domestic lender to foreign borrower) and cash flows “in” (foreign lender to domestic borrower). Foreign companies borrow around $1.2 trillion using NCCBR, and foreign companies lend around $1.3 trillion using NCCBR (Figure 1). Combined, about half of the NCCBR are cross-border. Moreover, about a quarter of NCCBR are denominated in a foreign currency.
Cross-border repos also exist in the tri-party and cleared segments.4 Contrary to the cross-border NCCBR, for most of these other cross-border repos, foreign borrowers move cash “out.” This is consistent with net foreign demand for U.S. dollars.
Figure 2: Pairwise Outstanding Cross-Border Repos by Company Type and Domicile
Note: Values are daily averages over the period from July 2025 to February 2026. In a reverse repo, lenders lend cash and borrow securities while in a repo, borrowers receive cash and lend securities. Wider bands represent larger daily average outstanding positions between counterparty types.
Sources: Bank of New York, OFR, Author’s analysis.
The financial companies that enter cross-border repos are typically banks, dealers, and hedge funds (Figure 2). Hedge funds are active in cross-border repos and are mostly cash borrowers. Both domestic and foreign hedge funds borrow from banks and dealers on the other side of the border. Hedge funds sometimes lend cash (or borrow collateral), which could relate to various relative-value trading strategies.5 Banks and dealers enter cross-border repos with other banks and dealers that are often affiliates, which may be related to internal liquidity management. Other entities, including asset managers and investment funds, participate modestly in cross-border repos.
Most cross-border repos (74%) are denominated in U.S. dollars and are typically backed by U.S. collateral. Repos that are denominated in a foreign currency, which occur only in the NCCBR segment, almost always cross-border (Figure 3). The prevalence of U.S. dollars in cross-border repos is consistent with research finding substantial amounts of dollar-denominated repos in European markets.6
Figure 3: NCCBR Outstanding by Currency (billions)
Note: Values are daily averages over the period from July 2025 to February 2026.
Sources: Bank of New York, OFR, Author’s analysis.
OFR is working to refine its data, potentially by identifying country of domicile, to enable further examination of emerging risks related to cross-border repos, such as counterparty risk or foreign-exchange risk. While these repos provide market liquidity, they also allow for the transmission of shocks across jurisdictions, and cross-border repos may also influence the effect of U.S. policy actions on repo rates.7
-
R. Jay Kahn et al., “Anatomy of the Repo Rate Spikes in September 2019,” Journal of Financial Crises, 5, no. 4 (2023): 1-25; and Mark E. Paddrik et al., “The Dynamics of the U.S. Overnight Triparty Repo Market,” OFR Brief No. 21-02 (Office of Financial Research, July 22, 2021). ↩
-
Ashlyn Cenicola et al., “Sizing the U.S. Repo Market,” The OFR Blog, December 4, 2025. ↩
-
OFR data include repos cleared by the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC) or managed by the Bank of New York’s Triparty platform, regardless of counterparty domicile, as well as NCCBR reported by covered U.S.-based financial companies. Cross-border repos were identified using counterparty domicile information derived primarily from Legal Entity Identifiers (LEI). Where LEI data were incomplete, entity domiciles were hand-coded based on the legal name of the entity. For private funds incorporated in geographies with few to no tax liabilities (sometimes called tax havens), such as the Cayman Islands or Bermuda, and managed by investment advisers with headquarters located elsewhere, the domicile of the headquarters was used. ↩
-
Samuel J. Hempel et al., “Why Is So Much Repo Not Centrally Cleared?,” OFR Brief No. 23-01 (Office of Financial Research, May 12, 2023); Robert Mann et al., “Repo Market Intermediation,” OFR Brief No. 24-07 (Office of Financial Research, November 14, 2024). ↩
-
Daniel Barth et al., “Hedge funds and the Treasury cash-futures basis trade,” Journal of Monetary Economics 155 (2025); Daniel Barth and Jay Kahn, “Basis Trades and Treasury Market Illiquidity,” OFR Brief No. 20-01 (Office of Financial Research, July 16, 2020). ↩
-
European Central Bank, “Financial Stability Review, November 2024,” November 2024. ↩
-
Felix Hermes et al., “The International Dimension of Repo: Five New Facts,” Working Paper No. 3065 (European Central Bank. 2025). ↩