OFR Monitor Shows Accelerating Shift to Government Money Market Funds

OFR Monitor Shows Accelerating Shift to Government Money Market Funds

Assets of U.S. prime money market funds have decreased by more than $700 billion since the beginning of the year, while assets of government money market funds have increased by about the same amount, according to the OFR’s monthly U.S. Money Market Fund Monitor (MMF Monitor). This trend accelerated in August.

The OFR’s Viktoria Baklanova and Daniel Stemp, lead researchers on the MMF Monitor, attribute the shift to the Oct. 14, 2016, deadline for implementing Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reforms. The reforms are intended to make prime money market funds less vulnerable to runs by investors. They also are intended to limit the potential stress on the financial system if a run occurs.

Prime funds invest in short-term bank securities and corporate debt securities. Government funds invest mostly in government securities, cash, and repurchase agreements (repos) that are collateralized with government securities or cash. Government fund assets totaled about $1.8 trillion at the end of August.

A chart of Total investments by category comparing prime retail and prime institutional funds from January 2011 through August 2016. Prime institutional funds are not present until mid 2016 when they represent the majority of total investments

A chart of Total investments by category comparing Government (No fees and gates) and Government (Fees and gates) institutional funds from January 2011 through August 2016.

The SEC reforms require prime and tax-exempt money market funds to split their investor base into retail and institutional investors. Funds for institutional investors must let their net asset value float with the value of the underlying portfolio’s assets. Both retail and institutional funds also must adopt liquidity fees and restrictions on redemptions called “gates.” Fees and gates are tools for limiting cash outflows during market stress.

Government funds are not required to adopt liquidity fees and gates. They can continue to sell and redeem their shares at a stable net asset value.

Ahead of the reforms, some investors are moving their assets from prime funds to government funds. Some fund managers are also converting prime funds to government funds.

Baklanova and Stemp also note that the sharp decline in the assets of prime money market funds is having ripple effects. For example, demand has declined for commercial paper and banks’ certificates of deposit (CDs) — traditionally common investments for prime funds.

In turn, the lower demand for commercial paper and CDs has increased banks’ expenses in raising short-term funds in the interbank market. As a result, the benchmark three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) has risen significantly (about 20 basis points) since early July. Historically, LIBOR has increased only during times of market stress or when the Federal Reserve tightened monetary policy.

Other debt issuers that use LIBOR as a benchmark rate are also affected. LIBOR is referenced in many corporate loans, retail mortgages, floating rate bonds, and securitized products. However, the recent increase is modest compared with the increases during the financial crisis. LIBOR and other private borrowing costs remain at the low end of historical ranges.

The OFR launched the U.S. MMF Monitor in July 2016 to help regulators and other users track money market trends. We update the data monthly with information that funds submit to the SEC on Form N-MFP.

Stacey Schreft is the Deputy Director for Research and Analysis at the Office of Financial Research